EpsilonX
08-15-2010, 12:24 AM
So people criticize bands for "selling out" and making more accessible music. But what if that's truly what they want to sound like? Take for example Avenged Sevenfold. They no longer wanted to have the metalcore sound with all the screaming, so they changed to how they wanted to sound and got accused of selling out.
But then, there are bands like Slayer, AC/DC and Cannibal Corpse who play the same music album after album and don't really change up their sound at all. On the third hand, there are bands like Emarosa who change their sound because they want to and get criticized by fans saying they preferred the original style, or saying they should have changed their names.
Y'see, I thought that the BAND decides what they want to sound like, NOT the fans. I mean, if they sound bad they won't have fans but if the band just blindly does what the fans want to, they're just trying to make people happy to buy their record and not actually playing the music they want to.
Another example is Metallica. They streamlined their sound, to bring out their full potential. They also all cut their hair. Now, to some people that was selling out, but I see it as doing what they wanted to do. They didn't want long hair anymore, and they didn't have the original energy and anger that fueled the original albums. Just because they change music interests a bit, does that mean they have to automatically not make music anymore? Personally, I think Load and Re-load are great albums, because they contain good music. It's not thrash metal, but who cares? It's very enjoyable music, and if you need more thrash just go find one of the 5000 thrash bands out there that sound exactly the same. If Metallica made more thrash, even if they didn't want to make thrash anymore, but made thrash because that's what people wanted to hear...to me that's more selling out than making different styled music
People just criticize bands for not making music to their specifications. If it's different at all, they get criticized. Whether it's more commercial, not as good, the same every album, or even if they just make 3 good albums and call it quits. No matter what, nobody will be satisfied.
Thoughts?
But then, there are bands like Slayer, AC/DC and Cannibal Corpse who play the same music album after album and don't really change up their sound at all. On the third hand, there are bands like Emarosa who change their sound because they want to and get criticized by fans saying they preferred the original style, or saying they should have changed their names.
Y'see, I thought that the BAND decides what they want to sound like, NOT the fans. I mean, if they sound bad they won't have fans but if the band just blindly does what the fans want to, they're just trying to make people happy to buy their record and not actually playing the music they want to.
Another example is Metallica. They streamlined their sound, to bring out their full potential. They also all cut their hair. Now, to some people that was selling out, but I see it as doing what they wanted to do. They didn't want long hair anymore, and they didn't have the original energy and anger that fueled the original albums. Just because they change music interests a bit, does that mean they have to automatically not make music anymore? Personally, I think Load and Re-load are great albums, because they contain good music. It's not thrash metal, but who cares? It's very enjoyable music, and if you need more thrash just go find one of the 5000 thrash bands out there that sound exactly the same. If Metallica made more thrash, even if they didn't want to make thrash anymore, but made thrash because that's what people wanted to hear...to me that's more selling out than making different styled music
People just criticize bands for not making music to their specifications. If it's different at all, they get criticized. Whether it's more commercial, not as good, the same every album, or even if they just make 3 good albums and call it quits. No matter what, nobody will be satisfied.
Thoughts?