PDA

View Full Version : What Gaming company should make a console


Metallica1983
10-03-2007, 07:15 PM
I think Sega should stop making games for other companie's consoles and create a new console
Jasperking
10-03-2007, 07:40 PM
Sega wont be able to make another console.. they are too lazy and dont have the money lol
Blackbird
10-03-2007, 08:27 PM
Sure its true about Sega, they don't have any money :D
LiNuX
10-03-2007, 08:27 PM
wasnt sega bought out by another company? i find myself repeating this lol

maybe Konami should make a console lol, another japanese one
lonewolfxix
10-04-2007, 08:54 AM
This thread hasbeen made before.. If a new company wereto make a console who would you want it to be? (http://www.gamers-forum.com/showthread.php?t=1219)
It's old but it's there...

Sega stopped making consoles as they weren't popular and they didn't have the capacity to make consoles as they had to sell of a large percentage of their factories to get money. Now they're stable making games but making a console again could run them under.
Supermoose
10-04-2007, 02:12 PM
reamcast 2 is on the way

D
Jasperking
10-04-2007, 02:15 PM
even if there was going to be dreamcast 2 i have looked it up and it said released end of 2006.. this means that i dont think they thought twice and arnt going to release it
lonewolfxix
10-04-2007, 02:16 PM
reamcast 2, eh? is that like.. a console made for the homosexual community which the controller goes in your butt?

sega can't afford to make a console.
Scott
10-04-2007, 02:17 PM
There is definetly one on the way. I had a link somewhere on another forum that proved it....
Jasperking
10-04-2007, 02:19 PM
well it was ment to come out Q4 2006 and it hasnt.. no word since either
lonewolfxix
10-04-2007, 02:19 PM
therewas also meant to be a console coming out that could play every cd format in existence but it never came out. Sega will not make another console and if they did it would probably be handheld or "sonic game on keyring!" or something.
Scott
10-04-2007, 02:23 PM
IGN Said it was on the way. Sega did confirm it. But then they took it back
Jasperking
10-04-2007, 02:28 PM
there you go then no dreamcast 2 because they realised it will fail and how much of a failure the first one was
Scott
10-04-2007, 02:51 PM
there you go then no dreamcast 2 because they realised it will fail and how much of a failure the first one was

The first one was ok. It wasn't a failure. It had one of the best Sonic games ever.
I think they just couldn't afford it. There were going to announce the games in E3 2006.
lonewolfxix
10-04-2007, 03:47 PM
the dreamcast was great but because of the way they designed it, their games weren't selling much. The dreamcast discs had no copy protection and you could rent and copy a game or even download it then burn it and it would play it. that probably shut the casket then nailed it shut for the dreamcast.
Jasperking
10-04-2007, 03:49 PM
The only games that did any good for dreamcast were the sonic adventure ones lol
Razor
10-12-2007, 01:38 PM
If someone made a console I think it should be rockstar or Ubisoft but i dont think there should be another console for me three is perfect.
Jasperking
10-12-2007, 01:40 PM
lol thats true about there is enough consoles atm. But both rockstar and Ubisoft would suck at making consoles.. unreliable lol
Razor
10-12-2007, 01:47 PM
But if Rockstar made a console it would sell because of GTA
Jasperking
10-12-2007, 01:58 PM
actually GTA isnt that good anymore lol. People are annoyed that GTA IV has been postponed so much
Razor
10-12-2007, 02:11 PM
I'm annoyed about GTA IV beening pushed back but while your waiting theres still loads of other games to look foward to like Mass Effect. GTA might not be as good as it used to be but its still fun to play and just go on a rampage